logo 

Cultural Interviews

Home »


Chao Robert Zheng Responsibility to Society versus Investors

YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sHxd4uXJtI

Traditional Chinese

我想這個問題呢,我們作為,嗯,做生意的一方的話,我們完全有義務應該提醒對方,應該有盡這個社會責任的這個義務。我們想,我們這樣,我們通常做的這個事情是設計項目。我們會儘量地告訴對方,你應該多多地去考慮,嗯,保護環境,而不是破壞環境。我們有這個義務去這樣子做,所以我們不管是,由於這樣做有可能導致這個生意的失敗。但是我們還是會堅持告訴對方清楚地這樣去做。當然,這個業主,他們有最終的決定的權利。嗯,如果是他們最後的決定還是不採納我們的意見的話,我們有可能因此 這個生意做不成。但也有可能我們還是會繼續做生意。但是我們,把我們該做的這個部分,我們已經清楚地傳達告訴了對方。


Simplified Chinese

我想这个问题呢,我们作为,嗯,做生意的一方的话,我们完全有义务应该提醒对方,应该有尽这个社会责任的这个义务。我们想,我们这样,我们通常做的这个事情是设计项目。我们会尽量地告诉对方,你应该多多地去考虑,嗯,保护环境,而不是破坏环境。我们有这个义务去这样子做,所以我们不管是,由于这样做有可能导致这个生意的失败。但是我们还是会坚持告诉对方清楚地这样去做。当然,这个业主,他们有最终的决定的权利。嗯,如果是他们最后的决定还是不采纳我们的意见的话,我们有可能因此 这个生意做不成。但也有可能我们还是会继续做生意。但是我们,把我们该做的这个部分,我们已经清楚地传达告诉了对方。


Pinyin

Wǒ xiǎng zhège wèntí ne, wǒmen zuòwéi, n, zuò shēngyì de yìfāng de huà, wǒmen wánquán yǒu yìwù yīnggāi tíxǐng duìfāng, yīnggāi yǒu jìn zhège shèhuì zérèn de zhège yìwù. Wǒmen xiǎng, wǒmen zhèyang, wǒmen tōngcháng zuò de zhège shìqing shì shèjì xiàngmù. Wǒmen huì jìnliàng de gàosu duìfāng, nǐ yīnggāi duōduō de qù kǎolǜ, n, bǎohù huánjìng, érbúshì pòhuài huánjìng . Wǒmen yǒu zhège yìwù qù zhèyangzi zuò, suǒyǐ wǒmen bùguǎn shì, yóuyú zhèyang zuò yǒu kěnéng dǎozhì zhège shēngyì de shībài. Dànshì wǒmen háishì huì jiānchí gàosu duìfāng qīngchu de zhèyang qùzuò. Dāngrán, zhège yèzhǔ, tāmen yǒu zuìzhōng de juédìng de quánlì. N, rúguǒshi tāmen zuìhòu de juédìng háishì bù cǎinà wǒmen de yìjian de huà, wǒmen yǒu kěnéng yīncǐ zhège shēngyì zuòbùchéng. Dànyě yǒu kěnéng wǒmen háishi huì jìxù zuò shēngyi. Dànshì wǒmen, bǎ wǒmen gāizuòde zhège bùfen, wǒmen yǐjīng qīngchu de chuándá gàosu le duìfāng.


English

For this question, I think… as a part of our doing business, from our side at least, we are completely obligated to remind the other side (the owner/proprietor) that they should do their best in fulfilling their obligation to be socially responsible. This is how we think of it. The things we typically deal with are design projects. We do everything we can to tell the other side that, you should consider this very carefully…you should protect the environment and not harm it. We have an obligation to do it this way. So, we are not concerned with the possibility that doing things this way may result in the failure of the business. We still support the (idea of) telling the other party, in no uncertain terms, the way things ought to be done. Of course, the owner has the right to make the final decision. If, for example, they decide in the end not to accept our advice, there is the possibility that we won’t be able to do business together as a result. But it’s also possible that we will. But as for doing what we feel should be done…we’ve already done our part and conveyed it very clearly to the other party.


Return to General Topic: Responsibility to Society versus Investors

Return to Chinese Topic: Responsibility to Society versus Investors

Authors: LouisPM, h.brinsko, orkelm.